Banking Risk Analytics & ResearchBuilt on published Pillar 3 disclosures
I. Live

Scenario Engine

Set a shock and the engine expands it across rates, spreads, FX and equities using historical correlations.

63 series · Sample 2008–2023
Mahalanobis expansion

Presets

0.0bp
−15.0bp
0.0bp
0.0bp
0.00%
0.00%

Horizon

Shocked variables

  • IT–DE 5y+80.0bp
  • ES–DE 5y+50.0bp
  • DE 10y−15.0bp

Severity

Calculating…

II. Analytics

Four instruments, one data layer.

01

Independent Research

Unbiased evaluation of bank equity and debt, focusing on tail risks and capital structure fragility often overlooked by sell-side analysts.

02

Peer Benchmarking

Capital, liquidity, asset quality and profitability compared across UK, EU and US peer groups, with headroom measured against each bank’s own regulatory requirements.

03

Scenario Stress Testing

Macro and market shocks run through a six-module top-down engine covering IRRBB, net interest income, deposits, IFRS 9 credit losses and the capital trajectory.

04

Continuous Monitoring

Early-warning flags for headroom erosion, RWA inflation, NPL acceleration and deposit flight, refreshed each time a new disclosure is ingested.

III. The Portal

One workbench for bank risk.

“Published disclosures are the evidence. The portal turns them into a comparable, stressable, continuously monitored view of every institution we cover.”
— RiskView methodology principle

Subscribers work directly in the portal: build peer groups, measure headroom against each bank’s own requirements, run scenarios through the stress engine and receive monitoring reports as new disclosures land. Every table exports to CSV; every report to PDF.

Sign in to the portal

Request portal access.

info@riskview.app

Benchmarking

/benchmarking
  • Default UK, EU and US peer groups, or build your own
  • Capital, liquidity, asset quality and profitability views
  • Radar comparison, history charts and CSV export

Stress Testing

/stress
  • Six-module top-down projection engine
  • Constrained and management-action outcomes side by side
  • Calibrated against BoE ACS and EBA published results

Monitoring

/monitoring
  • Fourteen early-warning flags per bank
  • Period-over-period deltas and peer-group roll-ups
  • PDF reports with per-bank email alerts

Disclosure Data

Pillar 3
  • Pillar 3 and annual report extraction
  • Three-pass validation against prior periods
  • SREP requirement version history
IV. Research

Published bank analysis.

Risk and capital analyses built from Pillar 3 disclosures, interim results and annual reports, newest disclosures first.

Special report · European peers

Seven European Banks: Peer Comparison

CET1 ranges from 13.0% to 14.4% across the seven banks, but leverage is the tighter constraint: six sit within 100bps of their requirement, even as RoTE rose at all seven.

10 Sept 2026 · 19 pagesRead report (PDF)
CET1 ratio at 30 June 2026
UBS
14.4%
Barclays
14.3%
HSBC
14.1%
Santander
14.0%
Deutsche Bank
13.9%
ING
13.1%
BNP Paribas
13.0%
Single bank · United Kingdom

HSBC Holdings plc

CET1 of 14.1% sits at the bottom of HSBC's target range after the Hang Seng buyout; RoTE of 18.2% is the highest of seven European peers, but leverage of 4.9% is now the tighter constraint.

10 Sept 2026 · 17 pagesRead report (PDF)
Single bank · Netherlands

ING Groep N.V.

CET1 of 13.1% leaves ING the thinnest MDA buffer of seven European peers (197bps) and the lowest leverage ratio (4.2%); RoTE of 15.3% and NPLs of 1.5% are strengths.

10 Sept 2026 · 18 pagesRead report (PDF)
Single bank · Switzerland

UBS Group AG

CET1 of 14.4% and an LCR of 177% are the highest among seven European peers; Swiss reform could still require about USD 20bn more CET1 at UBS AG.

10 Sept 2026 · 17 pagesRead report (PDF)
Single bank · Germany

Deutsche Bank AG

Record profit, but CET1 of 13.9% leaves 271bps over MDA and RoTE of 11.9% is the lowest of seven European peers; NPLs are 2.0% but coverage is only 33%.

10 Sept 2026 · 17 pagesRead report (PDF)
Single bank · United Kingdom

Barclays PLC

CET1 of 14.3% ranks second of seven among European peers, but MDA headroom of 210bps is thin; RoTE rose to 14.8%, while leverage and a 420bps BoE stress drawdown are the pressure points.

10 Sept 2026 · 16 pagesRead report (PDF)
Single bank · France

BNP Paribas SA

CET1 of 13.0% is the lowest of seven European peers and leverage of 4.4% sits below the median; RoTE rose to 13.3% but its EBA-basis NPL ratio of 2.9% is the second highest.

10 Sept 2026 · 16 pagesRead report (PDF)

Earlier reports

Disclaimer

All research, benchmarks and stress test projections on RiskView are provided for information and research purposes only and do not constitute investment, credit, legal, regulatory or financial advice. Scenario engine outputs are hypothetical co-movements derived from historical market correlations over 2008–2023 and are not forecasts. RiskView is an AI-enabled portal: parts of the data processing and draft commentary use AI-assisted tools, and while outputs are checked before publication they may contain errors or omissions. Verify figures against the original disclosures before relying on them. Research reports published on RiskView are AI-generated, with key figures spot-checked by Dynamic Strategies; each report carries an AI disclosure.